Kiwibank is well known for it's association with multimillionaire antifelinist
and political aspirant Gareth Morgan via the GMK KiwiSaver scheme, Morgan sold the
business to Kiwibank for the tidy sum of 50 million dollars.
Back in September 2016, Kiwibank entered into a partnership with Predator Free
New Zealand Trust and Department of Conservation. Kiwibank decided this was a
worthwhile cause that might just drum up some business. They failed to consider the
moral, ethical and political hot potato they were grasping at when they chose to support
The press release from Predator Free New Zealand dated 5th September 2016 says
Kiwibank will contribute to the unachievable environmental extremist goal of 'Pest Free
New Zealand by 2050'. We understand Kiwibank will donate 1.7 million dollars toward
environmental extremism which will be used to fund some of the private eco-fascist
extremist 'community groups' which have sprung up all over the place like a plague of
poisonous mushrooms and also fund Department of Conservation dogs. There are two types
of 'conservation' dogs, 'protected species dogs' who sniff out the location of protected
species and 'pest detection dogs'.
The press release states: "Pest detection dogs have been used to indicate the
presence of target predators (stoats, rodents or Cats). In the majority of
situations, these dogs indicate the subtle sign or scent of the target animal rather
than locate the live animal. This information is then used to attempt to eradicate
the animal or animals by other methods like trapping, poisoning or shooting."
They suggest 'pest detection dogs' are used only for detection purposes however if
we read the words of commenter Paul Martinson on the Polhill Restoration Trust Page over
at the Halo Project Website, the real use of conservation dogs is clarified.
We quote Paul Martinson from the Polhill Restoration Trust page:
"If I can say this; maybe someone can obtain or train a DOC certified predator dog
for feral Cats within the Halo and put it to work. I've had one..and it is an
effective way to eradicate the trap shy animals. They are smaller in number than
stoats but very destructive."
Lets get clear, the so called 'halo' around Zealandia Sanctuary is a residential
area and these evil people contemplate turning loose Department of Conservation
'predator dogs' to kill any Cat the dogs can find.
A second article by Jessy Edwards appeared on the Idealog website "in
association with Kiwibank" on 6th December 2016. In December, Kiwibank also began
displaying posters in their branches promoting the Department of Conservation dogs.
This is an interesting article, both telling when it comes to the mindset of
those engaging themselves in trapping, and also chilling when one notes the images
of children being indoctrinated into ideology of enviro-fascism. Killing things is
nothing to be proud of kids! Kim Waghorn, Kiwibank marketing manager is quoted as
stating she found the act of engaging in trapping "weirdly addictive". It's
interesting Kim feels this way about trapping because in the following article over
at the Predator Free NZ website we find the following quotes from Nick
Tansley of Gareth Morgan's Halo Project:
"Trapping brings people closer together. Everyone's working together (towards
the goal of Wellington as a predator-free capital) and helping each other out." He's
even heard of people perched on their porches armed with slug pellets. "It gets
Back at the beginning of April 2016, Nick was a guest speaker on "Enhancing The Halo"
at the WCC Nursery open day. One of our supporters attended the meeting and when a member
of the audience asked if her kitten could get caught in the rat trap. He assured her:
"We're not out to get Cats". Yet on the same page we find the following chilling quotes:
"What if you have a cat or five? There are cat-friendly traps too."
"Tansley points out that you can still own a Cat while considering the native
wildlife: microchip your cat so they can be identified in a Cat roundup" Nick either
blatantly lied when he stated "We're not out to get Cats", or he's very confused.
Here is one of the Department of Conservation dog handlers and his dog, one
Brad Windust of the Northland environmental extremist group Bay Bush Action Trust.
At last count, their website states they have murdered 81 Cats. Up to now we have
chosen not to publish any horror pics. However as Kiwibank has chosen to fund
despicable bloodthirsty individuals like Brad Windust, and possibly Kim Waghorn
has no idea of what Kiwibank is funding, we will publish some of the photographic
evidence we have collected.
CAUTION: THE FOLLOWING LINK CONTAINS HORRIFIC IMAGES OF MURDERED CATS
Before proceeding we'll respond to the quotes above from Nick Tansley. You fascists
of the private environmental extremist movement have absolutely no right to conduct "Cat
roundups" within urban and residential areas at all. We knew from the outset the
Green eco-nazis at Wellington City Council planned to outsource the murder of
countless Cats within residential areas to amateur environmental groups and later
we received confirmation of this via leaked legal consultation documents. For the
record we strongly disapprove of citizens sitting on their porches armed with any
The plan is to ride roughshod over the Animal Welfare Act and designate any Cat
without a microchip ID as 'feral' and allow private environmental extremist groups
to conduct an ongoing campaign of mass murder against people's beloved Feline family
members. All of this talk of microchips 'to keep your Cats safe' is a red herring,
Without a doubt, the extremist environmentalists want to kill them all. So if you love
Cats and keep Cats it is your moral duty to stand up to those like Nick who openly admit
they are addicted to killing.
Now, the Halo Project is an organisation that was set up by none other than the
antifelinist Gareth Morgan, and we were not at all surprised to discover a mugshot of
his daughter, the antifelinist Jessi Morgan a bit further down the page in the
idealog article. Seems she is the spokesperson for Predator Free New Zealand. No
surprises there, wherever you see anything to do with environmental extremism you
can bet the Morgan cult has a dirty great greasy finger in the metaphorical pie.
Jessi Morgan is quoted as stating "It’s the gamification of how many rats did you
catch? that is so addictive". How interesting, there's that 'addictive' word again.
We feel any form of addiction is something to be concerned about, especially so
if what one is addicted to involves killing. From the esoteric perspective there's
all sorts of reasons a person might find themselves in the position of being
addicted to the desire to kill. However, most people have no understanding of
esoteric matters, so for now we will put aside our some 35+ years practical hands-on
experience with thought-forms & tulpas, larvae, lower elementaries and lower astral beings,
our understanding of how the release of etheric and astral force from the victim at
the time of death can give a person a 'hit', not to mention the sciences of magick
and demonology in general, lest we be red carded with standard response of the
ignorami, namely 'conspiracy theory', which for the record is term originally seeded
into the common vocabulary for the purposes of damage control by none other than the
So for now, we'll just stick to the mainstream and suggest anyone who is
addicted to something is getting some form of 'hit' each time they engage in
whatever the activity is they find to be addictive and addictions of any form tend
to be progressive. For example, watching a little 'harmless' pornography can easily
progress to stealing lingerie, stalking female members of the community and if
unchecked can eventually progress to engaging in the act of rape.
Our view is some of these people who have an addiction to killing small furry
animals will quite possibly progress to killing larger creatures or even human
beings. That is the nature of addictive behavior, it tends to progress. So, to Kim
Waghorn, Nick Tansley, Jessi Morgan and others of their ilk we say: Consult with
your doctor, get a referral note to mental health services and at least participate
in a mental health assessment, because we have no doubt that folks like you people
have a few screws loose. Kiwibank likes to think of the unattainable predator free
goal along the lines of the United States Apollo moonshots. "Going to the moon" they
say. More like a pack of flippin' loonies! Get help before you do something extra
nasty while servicing your killing addiction and you find yourselves in a mental
healthcare facility or appearing before the court.
All we can add is if you do not want to be a part of this madness there are
other options for banking available, and changing who you bank with is a fair way
to protest, just be sure to tell Kiwibank why you chose an alternative option for
12 February 2017
Wildlife Foxton Trust
Amateur environmental extremist group Wildlife Foxton Trust first came to our
attention at the end of April 2016 when a report was published in the Manawatu
Standard detailing the group's wish to engage in 'Cat control' activities. In true
Fairfax Media fake news form, the header image to this article of a Cat with a
captured bird was not even taken in New Zealand.
John Girling spoke before Horizons Regional Council (HRC) in a submission to
the HRC regional 'pest' management plan, claiming 'feral' Cats in the Foxton area
"kill birds and cause a lot of trouble". The group planned a survey to "consult the
community on possible 'feral' Cat control options" and to document all domestic Cats
in the Foxton area, prior to a 'trial' involving compulsory microchipping of
domestic Cats. Girling is quoted in the article as stating "Our approach is we would
like to microchip companion Cats to protect them from 'feral' Cats and the 'disease'
carried by 'feral' Cats". He stated the group was considering approaching the
antifelinst Gareth Mogan's Morgan Foundation for funding. HRC chairman Bruce Gordon
asked if the people catching Cats would be able to check if the Cats they planned to
catch have a microchip ID. Girling replied that "everything caught in their traps
was brought back to their centre".
Oh Really? Keep this statement from John Girling in mind folks, and read on...
At this point we challenge John Girling to explain to the public exactly how
the compulsory microchipping of domestic Cats can protect them from the supposed
'diseases' they claim are carried by 'feral' Cats. The fact is a microchip offers no
such protection and microchips fail John. John Girling is just another antifelinist,
he lies with the lies of the Morgan cult, and he insults all intelligent New
Zealanders with his assumption the citizens of New Zealand are stupid. Undoubtably
what Wildlife Foxton Trust really seek is license from Horizons Regional Council to
conduct the wholesale slaughter of all Cats they catch who do not return an ID
reference on a microchip scanner.
Prior to Girling's submission, the Morgan cult engaged in collective lobbying
of Horizons Regional Council. In all, the council received a total of 94 submissions
to the plan. 47 regarding 'feral' Cats, and 45 of these from the antifelinist Gareth
Morgan's hate group. Most of the submissions were from outside of the Manawatu
region. On 11 May 2016 Girling was back before the HRC Environment Committee. His
presentation included the alleged "problems with 'feral' Cats killing birds on the
In June 2016, Horizons Regional Council declined to actively engage in the
Feline holocaust the Morgan cult and John Girling hoped for and chose not to make
any changes regarding the classification of 'feral' Cats. The antifelinist Jessi
Morgan stated "As soon as we take Gareth away from it people will listen, rather
than say 'oh he just wants to kill all the Cats'".
Jessi Morgan, take notice Feline Rights will investigate and document every
person who is involved with the orchestrated libelous propaganda campaign against
the Cats. Antifelinism is a form of extremism that is just as bad as antisemitism,
and all involved with it can expect to be treated with the same level of disdain
afforded to antisemites and other racists.
By July 2016, Wildlife Foxton Trust's plan to trap and execute as many Cats as
possible had reached an impasse due to a lack of funding. John Girling stated "We
are not able to address the 'feral' Cat issue at the moment because of 'political
sensitivity', I think they call it". You think? Hey John, what the hell are you
doing on the Community Board if you cannot see the obvious? The majority of New
Zealanders don't want far left private environmental fascists rounding up their
Cats. We love our Cats, they are members of our families, it's not quantum physics,
it's common sense. If you cannot grasp the basics of common sense then the ideal is
for you to tender your resignation from the Community Board immediately. Girling
stated their intention is to be 'patient', and indicated they still intend to "carry
out a survey of companion Cat owners to find out what animals they owned and what
they thought of control measures".
Feline Rights urges residents of the Foxton area to refuse to participate in
the so called 'survey'. This group is a private environmentalist cult and they have
no right to 'survey' residents regarding the number of Cats they keep. The right
thing to do is formally trespass them from your places of residence. In our view
what they are really doing is taking a census of your Cats, noting where Cats are
and marking them for execution at a later stage, just like the Nazis did to the
Back in October 2015, Horizons Regional Council supplied 40 traps to Wildlife
Foxton Trust who first used them for the purposes of indoctrinating children into
the ideology of environmental extremism, prior to the environmental brownshirts
setting the traps. These traps are "tippy traps", they are live capture traps. John
Girling stated "Any creatures caught will be brought back to our depot where they
will be dealt with humanely as overseen by our own veterinary surgeon." We'd love to
put a name and face to the vet, because if you live in the Foxton area and your Cat
mysteriously vanishes, chances are this will be the vet who has put your Cat to death,
simply for being a Cat. Email us if you know who this vet is.
A week before the first report on Wildlife Foxton Trust's proposal to conduct
antifelinist activities appeared in the Manawatu Standard, another article was
published in the Horowhenua Mail. Wildlife Foxton Trust have been indoctrinating
children into the ideology of the far left environmental fascist movement. John
Girling is a retired industrial psychologist, which suggests to us he's thought
through his plan of action carefully, and has a fair idea of how to go about it.
Indoctrinate the children now, in the interest of endless proliferation of the dogma
of environmental extremism through all future generations.
While we've been investigating Wildlife Foxton Trust since they first publicised
their antifelinist sentiments in April 2016, we've refrained from publishing much
about them. However, on 2nd February 2017 a report appeared in the Manawatu Standard. A
witness discovered six of the traps painted by the children of Foxton Beach School
containing skeletal remains and decomposing deceased animals. Wildlife Foxton Trust
had failed to check the traps daily as required by law and the trapped animals had
suffered a horrible death from thirst and starvation.
The witness quoted John Girling as saying to her "they were pests and he wouldn't
mind leaving them there indefinitely". Girling claimed his comment had been
'skewed' by the witness, but was quoted as stating to the Fairfax journalist "I did
say it's not a big problem, they are just pests." He also stated "the traps were
supposed to be checked once or twice a week".
Well, that's wrong for a start, the law requires live traps to be checked daily. HRC
'habitat protection co-ordinator' Aaron Madden is quoted in the article as stating
"volunteers were informed about the importance of checking traps daily", Aaron
Madden of HRC also confirmed "It was possible for hedgehogs and Cats to enter the
traps but checking them daily should allow them to be released".
We contacted Horizons Regional Council via email regarding the matter of
hedgehogs. Aaron Madden of HRC promptly responded stating the report published in
the Manawatu Standard on 2 February 2017 is incorrect on their position regarding
hedgehogs. HRC states hedgehogs are a known threat to native wildlife and thus are
one of the 'pests' being targeted. HRC also states "The intention was to release any
Cats (or any other 'pet') caught and euthanize the 'pests' caught".
Manawatu SPCA inspector and manager Danny Auger stated "if people weren't
checking the traps they were failing with their obligations". Ministry for Primary
Industries animal welfare manager Kate Littin also confirmed, when using live traps
there is a legal requirement for traps to be checked daily.
John Girling stated "the traps were supposed to be checked once or twice a
week", therefore it's clear Wildlife Foxton Trust is willfully in violation of the
Animal Welfare Act. Undoubtedly an example needs to made of these people by way of
prosecution. Feline Rights will follow the matter up with the relevant authorities to
ensure all involved are brought to justice.
On 10 February 2017, NZ Herald published an update on the environmental
extremists active in the Foxton area. Horizons Regional Council have halted the live
trapping activities of Wildlife Foxton Trust and withdrawn the traps from
Wildlife Foxton Trust is quoted in the article as stating "it is looking at
whether kill traps could replace the live-capture traps". Aaron Madden of Horizons
Regional Council stated "the downside of kill traps was the possibility of killing
pets, which is why live-capture traps were used in the first place".
Feline Rights compliments HRC for taking action and withdrawing the live
capture traps from use. However, as it appears Wildlife Foxton Trust will now
attempt to proceed with it's trapping activities using 'kill' traps, the problem has
the potential to go from bad to worse. 'Kill' traps like the ones illustrated above
do not kill instantaneously, they maim and the animals caught still die a slow death
from hunger and thirst or possibly from infection of the wound.
If these kill traps are allowed to be deployed it is only a matter of time
before a companion animal is killed or maimed. We believe traps such as these may
also pose a threat to protected native species. The media and animal welfare groups
are now watching closely. It's not going to be a good look for anyone involved with
the matter when a companion animal falls victim to the incompetence of the amateur
environmental extremist movement.
As Wildlife Foxton Trust have already demonstrated their inability to monitor
live capture traps they have set, we implore Horizon's Regional Council to cease all
support for Wildlife Foxton Trusts trapping activities, and revoke or deny
permission for them to use any form of traps.
What has happened in the Foxton area is an object lesson to local governmental
bodies nationwide on how things can go terribly wrong when local government
outsources 'pest control' activities to private environmental extremist groups and
we feel the example of Foxton behoves local government to have a total rethink on
the value of private-public partnerships with amateur environmental groups when it
comes to truly humane animal management.
Last time we checked in January 2017, the membership of Liman's 'conservation'
group was a total of 20 individuals. Compare this figure to the population of
Miramar: 9,588 at the 2013 census. Te Motu Kairangi are a miniscule fraction of a
percent of the population, they are a small group of extremists imposing their will
on an entire district.
This feature article of antifelinist propaganda by journalist Sam Duff
appeared in the Cook Strait News on 2nd February 2015, just four months after the
inception of the National Cat Management Strategy Group. The Cook Strait News along
with The Wellingtonian are 'community newspapers' delivered free to every mailbox in
the Wellington region. One can have a 'no circulars' sign on one's letterbox, yet
regardless of one's wishes, a copy will be delivered each week without fail. In
truth, it's a propaganda tabloid created by the ruling caste, distributed with the
intention of manufacturing consensus amongst those members of the public who are
challenged to define objective reality for themselves.
In other words, they make sure everyone gets a copy so their propaganda
is spread for social engineering
The publication of this article was carefully timed to synchronise with Morgan
Foundation project manager Jessi Morgan's submission to Wellington City Council's
consultation on the 'Draft Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2014'. The article
was published in Cook Strait News on Monday 2nd February 2015, and the consultation
process closed on Friday 6th March 2015. We've sourced a copy of Morgan's
submission, In it, she cites the alleged killing of 18 tui, supposedly by a
Normally we'll link to articles, but due to Cook Strait News hosting it's back
issues on issuu.com, one of the most poorly coded and unusable websites we have ever
visited, we've scanned and posted the entire article here. If issuu.com has an issue
with that, we suggest they learn to construct websites properly, then we will be
prepared to link to their site.
The article by journalist Sam Duff begins by subjecting us to
Wikipedia defines loaded language as "wording that attempts to influence an
audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes". We quote: "The movements of a
sneaky 'moggy' with a taste for killing are being tracked as it slinks, creeps and
skulks it's way through the Miramar bush"... an object lesson in loaded language.
Liman claims his environmental extremist group found the remains of 18 dead tui and
as there were some Cat paw prints they assume a single Cat killed them all. That's
interesting, lets compare the opinion of Joakim Liman with the opinion of Landcare
Research wildlife ecologist John Innes who stated in
"I've worked with tui restoration in Hamilton for a decade, and I've never had an
account of a tui, one of our radio-banded birds, being killed by a Cat".
We agree with John Innes, we've kept Cats for 50 years and we have never
witnessed a Cat capture a tui. They are larger than a blackbird and as tree
dwellers, it's rare to see a tui at ground level. We have noted tui will fly into
windows and be killed by the impact with the glass. Our understanding is this
happens when tui have dined on fermented nectar and fly while intoxicated. The
states tui "have even been known to mob harriers and magpies". The harrier is a
large hawk, and magpies are well known to attack humans. It stands to reason that as
tui are prepared to take on harriers and magpies, in most instances tui would
certainly be able to defend themselves from a Cat.
Our view is it is extremely unlikely a single Cat could be responsible for
killing 18 tui. Joakim Liman is either lying on behalf of Gareth Morgan's
'conservation' cult, or more likely the culprits would be stoat, ferret or weasel.
The remaining carrion will have attracted all sorts of critters, including the local
Cats, hence the alleged paw prints the group claim they found.
The article proceeds to use further loaded language to define the location as
a 'crime scene' and the Cat who supposedly killed the tui as a 'four legged
criminal'. We also note Liman demonstrating his ignorance of the law by promoting
the idea of 'feral' verses 'domestic' and omitting the other definition of 'stray'
as defined under the the Animal Welfare Act. Liman also demonstrates his ignorance
by assuming all domestic Cats have a collar: "They do not yet know if the white Cat,
which has a black tip on it's tail, is a 'feral' or domestic Cat, as they cannot
tell whether it is wearing a collar". Later in the article he states: "Owners could
attach a multitude of bells to their collars".
A few words on Cat collars from Feline Rights to Joakim Liman: Most domestic
Cats do not actually have collars and that's a good call, collars are well known to
be a hazard for Cats, as documented in the following article from the Nelson
Liman parrots the antifelinist Gareth Morgan and states "A really easy thing
to do would be to just close the door and keep them inside". Well, we'd like to see
the ignorant antifelinists confined to quarters forever and see how they like the
experience of permanent confinement. Of great interest to us was Joakim Liman's
statement that "people should at least keep their Cats inside during the day because
that is when tui and other natives are out and about". Alright, compare that
statement with the published opinion of none other than Karen Fifield, the CEO of Wellington Zoo
The above link is one sick and twisted article from Karen Fifield which
includes an array of poisonous nonsensical lies. For example this insulting quote:
"Microchipping Cats helps to make sure that Cats get the love and care that they
deserve". By stating such, the intended inference is anyone who does not engage in
microchipping does not love or care for their Cats. Well pardon us you old harpy but
we've been keeping Cats for decades prior to you importing yourself from Australia
and our Cats are some of the most loved and cared for Cats in town thanks, no
microchip required. Do you think we are stupid? We know the only reason you people
want compulsory microchipping is to legitimise the murder of countless Cats, but we
The quote from Karen Fifield that is important at this point is: "for the past
nine years we have been asking our visitors to think about how they can be
responsible 'pet' 'owners' through two simple requests – keeping their Cats in at
night, and keeping their dogs on a lead". How interesting, on one hand we have Zoo
employee Joakim Liman saying 'keep your Cats indoors during the day' and on the
other hand we have Zoo CEO Karen Fifield saying 'keep your Cats in at night'.
Without a doubt, the right hand does not know what the left hand is doing, and this
comparison of published statements amounts to indisputable proof that what is being
expounded on both counts is nothing more than opinionated antifelinist
Further evidence there is no consensus amongst 'conservationists' when it
comes to the draconian proposition of 'Cat curfews' comes in the form of the
following article published on the Zealandia Sanctuary website. We quote: "Do you
have a Cat? Consider keeping your Cat indoors during the day". We published a link
to the original article a few months ago and within a couple of weeks the page had
mysteriously vanished from their site. Quite possibly the reason it was removed is
because they noticed Feline Rights was linking to the page and at the time
Wellington City Council was planning to impose night curfews on Cats. We've sourced
a copy of the article which was removed, it's now available for download
Liman claims 12 million native birds are killed by Cats in NZ each year, we'd
love to know where he got that figure from, until we have the actual peer reviewed
scientific documentation before us we'll assume he has pulled that figure out of
Joakim Liman imported himself from Sweden in 2009. In our opinion the easiest
option for all is for him to return to Sweden. While we are all too pleased to have
people immigrate to New Zealand, we do need for new New Zealanders to integrate
themselves into New Zealand culture. We don't know how you do things in Sweden
cuzzie, but for generations our people have kept Cats, they are our beloved family
members. If you wish to be a New Zealander you need to understand this fact.
Integrate and accept New Zealand culture, including our Cats or as we say in
"On yer bike mate", which in this context means go back to where you came from.
On 26 September 2016, Wellington City Council announced a joint
collaboration with Greater Wellington Regional Council and the
. The Next Foundation is a philanthropic environmental and 'educational'
organisation. It is connected with the Morgan cult via their mutual association with
the R & D group 'Zero Invasive Predators'. The plan is to attempt to make Wellington
'predator free'. They state that rats and stoats are the target, but the truth is
all non indigenous animals and birds will be targeted. Rats, stoats, opossums, Cats
and hedgehogs for starters and if we take a look at the
section on non-native birds
over at the Te Motu Kairangi website we see sparrows, starlings, blackbirds and
rosellas are all apparently on the 'hit' list. We also understand pigeons and ducks
are on the council's hit list of critters to be 'vanished'.
Liman cites non-native birds as undesirables
because in his view they are carriers of 'diseases'.
Citing disease as an issue is old form of hate propaganda. In Der Stürmer, a
weekly propaganda tabloid of the Nazi era, quite similar in some ways to today's Cook
Strait News, The antisemite Julius Streicher often cited disease as one of the
issues that supposedly made Jewish people undesirables in the twisted opinion of the
National Socialist regime.
Spot The Difference If You Can
The idea is to make a start with the turf Liman's group has claimed, namely
the Miramar peninsula, then proceed with further environmentalist pogroms against
all non-indigenous fauna across the entire city. Later, the plan is to eradicate all
non indigenous plants, Liman is already suggesting citizens aim for at least 25% of
the plants in their gardens to be native plants.
Wellington City Council enviro-fascists celebrate the 'pest-free capital' initiative
The press release from the WCC propaganda office states: "Without introduced
predators, birds, lizards, geckos and other native fauna will be able to grow and
thrive in Wellington, bringing significant environmental, social and economic
This statement is a very odd piece of spin from the environmentalist minority.
For those who would care to look, native wildlife already abounds in the city,
therefore no micromanagement is required. "Economic benefits" refers to the
erroneous assumption that more birds = more tourists = more earnings from tourists.
The majority of tourists could not care less about birds and those who do will visit
Zealandia sanctuary, Wellington Zoo, or one of the national parks. "Social
benefits"? There aren't any, all these misguided extremist individuals do is draw
attention to themselves as they proceed to actively divide the community and sew the
seeds of social unrest.
We were not surprised to see Cat hater Myfanwy Emeny present and we are in the
process of investigating the rest of them. It is clear WCC Environment Partnership
Leader Tim Park has a close association with some of the most infamous antifelinists
in New Zealand. Over at the Forest and Bird blog we found the following article by
the antifelinist Polhill Paul.
A three day bush bromance with none other than antifelinists Geoff Simmons and
Polhill Paul is not a good look for a senior member of council staff. The closer
we look, the more cronyism, conspiracy and conflict of interest becomes
17 May 2017
Propaganda Messages From Wellington City Council and SPCA
The relentless pursuit of antifelinism continues to be one of the top agendas
of Wellington City Council. Quote: "The council is about to start looking at new
ideas to reduce the conflict between Cats and wildlife as part of a new animal
Quite frankly, it beggars belief the council continues to cite the alleged
threat of Cats to native wildlife. Wildlife which has only recently been
reintroduced to the region by the environmental movement. Legal opinion has been
provided to the council some nine months ago which points out the council has no
legal authority for mandating the compulsory microchipping of Cats, and no legal
authority to pass bylaws for the supposed protection of native wildlife.
The executive summary of legal opinion from lawyer Mai Chen was delivered to
councillors of the previous triennium in August 2016. It states: "The protection of
wildlife is irrelevant under the councils bylaw making powers under the Local
Government Act and the Health Act". "If the council proceeds to implement the
proposed bylaw for this improper purpose, the bylaw will be ultra vires" (beyond
their legal power or authority).
If it's worth doing, it's worth forcing people to do it. So put on your
jackboots, armbands and faux toothbrush moustaches, and let's all get down and do
the goosestep in celebration of environmental fascism wrapped in the lie of 'animal
COMPULSORY MICROCHIPPING = MASS EXTERMINATIONS
This article promoting the compulsory microchipping of Cats by Fairfax
journalist Ruby Macandrew was published in the propaganda tabloid 'The
Wellingtonian' on 27 April 2017. The online version differs slightly from the print
version which included the following quote from Wellington SPCA animal care manager
Nick Taylor in red letters. We use the old red letter trick too, the idea is to draw
the reader's attention to ensure they take notice of specific text, as we have done
with the example above. However, the text omitted from the online version of the
article goes one step further and contains a message intended to subliminally slip
across the threshold into the subconscious minds of readers who are challenged to be
That message is: "Ignore the fact that it's going to be compulsory"
They anticipate your excuses, just ignore the facts and do as you are told
The article begins with: "Getting a jump on anticipated excuses for not
microchipping Cats in the capital is the motivation behind a new Wellington City
Council and SPCA collaboration". Repetition is one of the tried and tested methods
of programing and indoctrination, so we were not at all surprised to note no less
than four instances of the words 'excuse' and 'excuses' embodied within this
article. They have done this with the intention of writing off any form of
reasonable dissent as excuses, thus justifying their evil intentions and programing
the not so smart amongst citizens into thinking in those terms.
In truth there is zero excuse for what these despicable individuals attempt to do
The article states the compulsory microchipping bylaw was passed following an
'intensive consultation process'. Our view is the consultation was a complete
whitewash, like many of the 'consultations' under Celia Wade-Brown's two terms as
We of the the pro-Cat lobby feel we were was not taken seriously. In all
likelihood, in the council's eyes it was already a done deal before the matter of
'Cat-control' legislation was announced. While compulsory microchipping is the
present issue, we will never forget the other 'Cat control' options proposed: A
limitation of the number of Cats one may keep, a ban on keeping Cats in supposed
'wildlife sensitive areas', night curfews on Cats and compulsory identification
tattoos for Cats.
Councillor Pannett was quoted in an article dated 17 March 2016 on the matter
of compulsory identification tattoos for Cats as stating: "It seems extraordinary,
but it would certainly get around the problem of not being able to identify your
Those with a knowledge of history are well aware of the other fascist regime who
used night curfews and identification tattoos to intimidate and disparage those who
were deemed problematical and ultimately designated as disposable.
When we approached WCC graduate adviser Jessica Clarke in April 2016, we asked
the council this series of questions
, our queries were forwarded to Councillor Pannett who replied to us with a single
paragraph claiming "I'm a big animal lover and want to see animals treated humanely
and with the respect they deserve". However, in an article published a month earlier
at the Radio NZ website, Councillor Pannett is quoted as stating: "Essentially
having the identification means we won't be trapping, and potentially putting a Cat
down if it is caught, our staff will know that it is a Cat 'owned' by someone".
The latter statement from the acting chair of the Environment Committee
herself is proof enough that 'animal welfare' is not what this is about and without
a doubt the mass execution of all Cats without a microchip ID is the council's
We told Councillor Pannet not to insult our intelligence. Our queries were
then forwarded to Kaine Thompson, leader of the office of the WCC CEO, who responded
with a hastily prepared piece of spin covering why the council was planning
legislation to give them the power to engage in the proposed draconian 'Cat-control'
measures. This 'explanation' was published on the WCC website, but has now been
removed. We've asked the council to put it back up on their site, but as they
haven't, we will now share the draft provided by Kaine Thompson in April
The article in The Wellingtonian claims 89% of submissions supported
compulsory microchipping. This of course includes a stack of collective lobbying
from the Morgan cult, all sent from the same email address,
shannon(at)morganfoundation.org.nz. The total number of submissions was 491. 174 of
these submissions were from the antifelinists at the Morgan Foundation.
It appears the council granted permission for Gareth Morgan's hate group to
have their own 'template' as part of the public consultation process, whatever that
is supposed to mean. This seems strange, given there was a secret consultation
between the council and key stakeholders prior to the public consultation taking
place. To our knowledge, the contents of this secret consultation have never been
disclosed to the public. We would expect the Morgan cult was included in the
aforementioned secret consultation with key stakeholders, so it appears to us in
addition to the council accepting 174 submissions all from the same email address at
the Morgan Foundation, the Morgan cult was granted the opportunity to have their say
The following extracts are from the WCC Environment Committee Agenda dated 4 Aug 2016
The entire document may be downloaded in *.pdf format (55mb)
The full text of written submissions may be downloaded *.pdf format (115.2mb)
All the council did is submit to the Morgan cult. As we have already
documented, certain council hired staff involved with the 'urban ecology' division
of the council are intimately involved with environmental extremism and the Morgan
cult itself. This is clearly a conflict of interest and in our view each of these
council hired staff involved with environmental extremism and Gareth Morgan's hate
group should not have their contracts renewed.
While on the subject of conflict of interest, Wellington mayor Justin Lester
is a member of the Wellington SPCA board.
This guy is a native bird maniac closely connected with Gareth Morgan's Halo Project.
Mayor Lester wants to turn all of Wellington into an environmental theme park at any
cost. Because of this, we feel his membership on the SPCA Board amounts to a
conflict of interest and we call for the immediate resignation of Justin Lester from
the Wellington SPCA board.
This is also about profit for NZ Companion Animal Council and profit for the
vets. Our estimate is if all companion Cats in New Zealand were microchipped, the
total profit for all involved parties amounts to the tidy sum of $120 Million
As we have pointed out countless times, this is not about keeping track of
lost companion animals or any other aspect of 'animal welfare'. What it is about is
the mass execution of all Cats who do not return an ID when scanned with a microchip
scanner. It appears capture and execution will be subcontracted out to private
environmental groups including individuals involved with the accursed Morgan cult.
Do you really think the antifelinists of the environmental extremist movement are
going to check for a microchip ID? We say they will not even bother, they will
simply murder every Cat they can catch.
Quote: "This is the council being proactive and working with SPCA so that it's
not just the burden on Cat 'owners'."
By planning your program of mass exterminations, we who serve Cats will now be
forever looking over our shoulders, looking with suspicion at other members of the
community and wondering to ourselves if the next person over is one of the
Cat-haters. Essentially you people have forever robbed us of our right to live our
lives in peace within the community and we will now be looking over our shoulders
forever. So pardon us, but we'd call that a burden of astronomical proportions. To
Nick Taylor we say, Cats do not have 'owners' Cats have servants. The Cats are
sacred animals, they are vessels of sacred energy. Cats are individuals and
individuality is a sure sign of ensoulment. If you do not understand this, whatever
other qualifications you may have, you are not qualified to serve the Cats.
A second article in the form of a press release from the WCC office of
propaganda was published at Wellington Scoop on 3 May 2017. Quote: "Microchipping is
a safe, simple and permanent method of identification, and one of the most effective
ways to keep your Cat safe". Our view is microchipping is not safe, any form of
foreign body is a potential health risk.
Safe from what? The enviro-nazis who wish to exterminate our Cats?
Quote: "Microchipping is a no brainer". The truth of the matter is one would
need to be brainless to buy into the idea. Quote: "Pets are part of the family, so
we want to keep them safe, and unlike collars, which can slip off, microchips are
permanent". First, microchips are not permanent, microchips can and do fail. Second,
our Cats were safe enough prior to the city embracing the accursed 'native
biodiversity' delusion and engaging in the creation of artificially created wildlife
habitats such as Zealandia Sanctuary, Polhill Reserve, Otari Wilton Bush, Miramar
Reserve, and other supposed 'wildlife sensitive zones'.
The environmentalists have reintroduced some native birdlife to urban and
residential areas and run an ongoing incessant campaign in the mainstream media
promoting the lies of antifelinism with the ultimate aim of eradicating all Cats
from New Zealand. These 'wildlife zones' have been forcibly imposed on us in the
past few years by the environmental extremist minority. Third, while we would
classify the term 'pets' as being a derogatory term similar to the 'N' word, right
you are, they are family members. The council, the council staff, the Morgan cult
and other environmentalist nutcases are now a clear and present threat to us and our
families. In our view that puts all involved with the matter in a similar category
As always, one can expect some intelligent comments from the readers of Scoop,
and the comments to this article make some very good points. Cackle McFee stated:
"Next they’ll recommend legislation for micro-chipping the kids or employees".
For the record, they are already microchipping humans in Sweden.
We believe the compulsory microchipping of Cats is a test phase to see how
citizens respond to the idea of compulsory microchipping in general and the ultimate
intent is to microchip all humans. When it comes to legislation to allow them to
engage in the compulsory microchipping of humans, they will most likely begin with
convicted criminals. A microchip is cheaper and more convenient than one of the
anklets presently used for home detention sentences, and providing the chip does not
fail, once it's implanted it's there for life. Thus the microchip is very handy tool
for monitoring recidivist offenders.
Committed psychiatric patients will be next. Corrections and psychiatric staff
will have no qualms about forcibly microchipping those in their care. Citizens will
likely support the idea of microchipping convicted criminals and those diagnosed as
suffering from mental illness, after all in the former case it's for the protection
of society and citizens, and in the latter case it's also for the protection of the
Chances are they will also attempt to force beneficiaries and pensioners to be
implanted with a microchip in order to receive benefit payments and conduct day to
day financial transactions. Like the present day WINZ payment cards, the
microchipping of beneficiaries would be a useful tool to ensure beneficiaries can
only buy approved goods and services. Making beneficiaries' financial transactions
fully cashless would certainly put a stop to those who blow their benefits on
cigarettes, liquor, gambling and illegal drugs. The only downside of a fully
cashless benefit system would be a large increase in begging for cash. However this
would only be a temporary issue as the ultimate intention of microchipping is to do
away with all cash.
The Draconian Plan For Obligatory Cashless Society
If we allow them to get away with the compulsory microchipping of Cats, the
compulsory microchipping of all humans is next. The globalist corporate dictatorship
wish to eliminate cash and conduct all financial transactions electronically.
Before you red card us as 'conspiracy theorists', you may like to read this:
Presently, microchips can be programed to communicate with other networked devices
via the technology known as near field communication
.This is the same technology that allows one to make a payment via one's smartphone,
paywave enabled bankcards and electronic ticket smartcards. The infrastructure for a
cashless society is here now. All that is required is for people to thoughtlessly
comply with the upcoming directive to get themselves chipped. As the technology is
developed further the authorities will likely be able to track your every move via
the chip. Total control is their intention.
In the interest of privacy and freedom it is your moral obligation to resist
17 July 2017
Councils To Vote On 'Cat Control' At Local Government NZ AGM
As Bizarre As A Monty Python Sketch, But No Laughing Matter
Back around 50 years ago, those masters of bizarre English comedy, Monty
Python's Flying Circus, had some fun with the idea of a Cat licence. The Python team
selected situations that were so surreal and preposterous they could not fail to get
the audience falling off their chairs with laughter. 50 years later in New Zealand,
due to an array of individuals in positions of power who would do well to have their
own heads examined, the idea of a Cat license is no laughing matter.
The remit to LGNZ requests "That Local Government New Zealand lobby the
Government to take legislative action as a matter of urgency to develop national
legislation to manage Cats with the proviso that legislation includes provision for
cost recovery for Cat management." The remit paper cites both the Dunedin Residents’
Opinion Survey 2014 and the Dog Control Survey as having received unprompted
comments regarding alleged problems with Cats.
We took a look at the Dunedin Residents’ Opinion Survey 2014, and it did not
have a whole lot to say about Cats other than in the section on 'unprompted
responses' where it states "Cats should be registered/Cat faeces everywhere". We
also noted the 2014 survey included complaints from the public about dog excrement.
Given that dogs are subject to registration and the last time we went out for a walk
it appears there is still an issue with dog excrement, it does not take a PhD in
scatology to conclude that registration of companion animals is not a solution to
our four pawed friends answering the call of nature.
We downloaded and read the Dog Control Survey Report from Dunedin City
Council and there is no mention of Cats at all. As Dunedin City Council is citing
these alleged submissions from the public, we'd like to see these submissions so we
can check how many of them amount to collective lobbying from the Morgan Foundation
and other environmental extremist groups. Done right, the remit document would
include the submissions made to DCC as an appendix. As these submissions are not
appended, our opinion is the alleged issues with Cats amount to nothing more than
We have documented Morgan Foundation GM and rabid antifelinist Geoff Simmons'
activities in Otago. He has been indoctrinating people into the lies of antifelinism
in the form of a lecture entitled "Predator Free Safe Havens" at Hutton Theater, Otago
University in Dunedin on 22nd April 2016 and in this article
in the Otago daily times on 24 May 2016. We do know that one of Morgan's Halo groups
is operating in the Dunedin area, that group goes by the name of Beyond Orokonui
Halo = Morgan Cult = Cat haters. We have no doubt the antifelinists of the Morgan cult have a hand in this matter.
The media has been having a field day with this issue, let's take a look at some of the recent articles
Councillor Peter Burt of Timaru District Council stated in this article such
rules were a bit "nanny state". We feel 'nanny state' does not cover what is
happening. Our view is the proposed 'Cat control' measures and some of the other
recent actions of local government are more akin to the micromanagement that comes
with fascism. On the proposed 'Cat control' measures, Councillor Kerry Stevens
stated "It's trying to solve a problem that doesn't really exist". Fraser Ross of
Forest and Bird engaged dogma regurgitation mode and stated Cats "certainly should
be kept indoors at night". Oh really? and exactly what might Cats be catching at
night? Compare this statement with the following statements from Landcare Research
wildlife ecologist John Innes "In New Zealand, Cats are most helpful at night"(1)
and "the one thing that is known is that they do their good stuff at night, if
you’re going to keep your Cats in at night you’re stopping them doing anything
good at all" (2)
Read on, because we have another quote or two from others that effectively refute
the assumption that keeping Cats indoors at night is supposedly a good idea.
Well, the vets would support the proposals with an estimated $120 million
dollars to be made from microchipping every domestic Cat in New Zealand. We suspect
the antifelinst Geoff Simmons' friend, NZVA Head of Veterinary Services Callum
Irvine, has been busy indoctrinating veterinarians on behalf of the Morgan cult.
Like the antisemite Julius Streicher citing disease as being one of the alleged
problems with Jewish people to justify the holocaust, Dr Dries Meyer of Vetlife
Timaru cites the threat of disease as a reason for keeping Cats in at night. Sure,
Cats can get into fights and catch diseases in the process, but in truth this can
happen at any time of the day or night. Dr Meyer states "Mandatory de-sexing is a
good thing". Dr Bryan Gregor of Aorangi Veterinary Services expressed support for
'Cat curfews', mandatory de-sexing and collars for identification, but he also stated
"You can run into issues with identity collars on Cats, like Cats strangling themselves"
In truth, the idea of mandatory desexing is nothing more than a pipe dream,
simply because it is unenforceable. We here at Feline Rights support de-sexing 100%,
however the only way to go about it is by engaging the public via education, because
there is no way for the authorities to check if every Cat in the community is
de-sexed. Feline Rights strongly disapproves of Cat collars, because Cats can be
injured. Here is an example of injuries sustained by a Cat who was forced to wear a
For your information 'Landscape Connections Trust' is none other than the
Beyond Orokonui group mentioned earlier. This is a new twist to the way these turkeys
are conducting their spin. Using two different names for the same group, so to
anyone who is too lazy to conduct research for themselves it appears there are two
groups of enviro-nazis speaking out when in this case there is actually only one.
The article states they are running a 'Halo Project' and as we have stated Halo =
the antifelinist Morgan cult. The article implies they are already using cage traps
to trap Cats, Their spokeswoman Jinty MacTavish who is an ex DCC councillor herself,
cites the position of Wellington on compulsory microchipping. She demonstrates her
ignorance by doing so. The evidence we have proves Wellington City Council has acted
outside of the law, and she insults our intelligence by spouting the tired old lie
of 'safety to Cats'. Pure Morgan cult doctrine if ever we saw it.
Councillor Kate Wilson of DCC is quoted as stating "'If you get rid of the stoats
and rats and weasels, what are the Cats going to live on if you don't manage them".
Alright, what are native raptors going to prey on if rodents and mustelids are
eradicated as part of the predator free pogrom? We'll tell you, other manu taonga
(native birds). The bottom line is if ignorant people barrel on in and eradicate
entire species to satisfy their blood lust, the entire ecological balance will be
upset. Socialist collectivist pogroms like this one have been tried before and they
have failed. In Peoples Republic of China in the era known as 'the great leap
forward' (1958 to 1962) China engaged in what is known as the 'Four Pests Campaign'
. Like the four pests campaign in China, the predator free NZ campaign stands to
upset the ecological balance. It is destined to fail.
"The legislation may give the council the power to destroy Cats that were not chipped"
This report in the NZ Herald has much of the same information as the previous
report in the Otago Daily Times. Councillor Kate Wilson is quoted as stating "At the
moment it is the only animal that is not legislated for, and it's peculiar". Yeah?
how about 'pet' rabbits, 'pet' rats and 'pet' birds, we bet you antifelinists don't have
legislation for them...yet. She also states people who were concerned about the proposal
"should be weighing up the concerns they have if you don't have it". Help us out
here, does anyone have any idea what she means, because we don't. Also included in
the article is the chilling statement "The legislation may give the council the
power to destroy Cats that were not chipped". This is something we have been warning
against from day one. Stand up to these haters now before they kill every Cat they
Jordan Williams, the Union’s spokesperson stated "This is the ultimate in the
local government trying to find expensive solutions to a problem that doesn’t
exist." NZ Taxpayers Union have set up a petition against this affront to morals,
ethics and common sense, If you love Cats and common sense, be sure to sign
Jordan Williams and Jock Anderson along with consultant ecologist Mark Bellingham
were interviewed on Radio Newstalk ZB on 9th July 2017. Following some number crunching
NZ Taxpayers Union estimates a cost of $9 million per annum to implement the proposed 'Cat
control' measures. As ecologist Mark Bellingham has a been a senior staff member at Forest
and Bird, we were expecting the usual antifelinist spin, but to our surprise what he had
to share was quite rational, and we agree with some of his statements. NZ Herald published
some of what Mark Bellingham had to say on 10 July 2017 here.
We quote Mark Bellingham - On the idea of Cat collars: "I haven't seen any
good evidence to show collars really make a difference". "They could get caught and
then you have an issue of cruelty to a Cat". On the idea of night curfews: "The idea
of a Cat curfew which would result in owners locking their Cats inside at night was
another unsupported solution" and "the size of the evidence is actually not very
good on that, because it seems that at night Cats are actually really good at
getting rid of rats and mice. That's the bulk of what they take". This matches with
our own observations when it comes to what Cats catch at night. Much gratitude to
Mark Bellingham for the honest appraisal.
Councillor's Comments Result In Social Media Furor
Fairfax Media published another article on 10 July 2016. Hamilton City Council
voted to support the proposed 'Cat control' measures. Councillor Mark Bunting
created a furor on social media with his comment "As our aging population grows, so
does the number of old ladies with Cats, so (Cat management) is something that we're
going to have to deal with". Accusations of both sexism and ageism were directed at
Councillor Bunting, and we understand at least one formal complaint was sent to
Hamilton City Council. Councillor Bunting has since tendered an apology on Facebook
for his comment.
Councillor Dave Macpherson is quoted as stating: Cat control could be "bigger
than Ben Fur". To Councillor Macpherson we say: This is not a laughing matter, some
people who keep Cats are lividly angry at what it is you people plan, others are
living in fear that their beloved Feline family members face the prospect of mass
Councillor Siggi Henry said "Paying for Cat 'ownership' might encourage people to treat
their animals better". About as moronic as her statement on 30 June 2017
during the debate on banning drinks with sugar in them from council workplaces when
she stated "You have a fat person falling on you, I think that would affect you".
Antifelinism, ageism, sexism, sizeism, either discrimination actually abounds at
Hamilton City Council, or it's simply a matter of collective serial
Councillor Leo Tooman asked where council would draw the line, he stated "Next thing,
we're going to have the kids who have to register their pet rabbit or their pet mice
or their canary." Right you are Councillor Tooman, if this madness is not stopped
now, perhaps the next stage is sending the homeless and the beggars to the
We emailed all elected representatives at Hamilton City Council including the
mayor expressing our displeasure they had decided to support the remit. We reminded
the council elected representatives have an obligation to conduct themselves as a
good example to constituents, shared our understanding of the ongoing campaign being
run by antifelinists of the environmental movement, and encouraged Hamilton City
Council to up their game.
Lawrence Yule, the president of LGNZ was interviewed by Newshub. That
surprised us as Mr Yule was quite evasive of the media when journalist Elton Rikihana
Smallman wrote the first article on the National Cat Management Strategy Group based
around leaked documents back in February 2016. Lawrence Yule cited the report of 31 May 2017
by Dr Jan Wright, Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, who erroneously
assumes Cats pose a "real risk to bird life, particularly in urban environments".
Yule claims the proposed measures are aimed only at 'feral' and homeless Cats. Do
not insult our intelligence Mr Yule, compulsory microchipping, registration,
curfews, and Cat rangers, these are all measures aimed at domestic Cats. Take it from
us folks, the antifelinists are filled with hate, they want to kill all Cats,
including your loved ones.
Video: 11 July 2017 - Lawrence Yule interviewed by John Campbell
Local Government NZ Votes In Favor Of Draconian Antifelinist Policy
On 25 July 2017, Local Government NZ voted by a slim margin of 51% in favour
of lobbying the NZ Government for draconian antifelinist legislation across the
entire nation. The proposed measures include compulsory desexing, compulsory
microchipping, night curfews, forcing Cats to wear collars with bells and 'Cat
rangers' to enforce the proposed legislation.
Prior to the vote, our friends at NZ Cat Coalition compiled a briefing paper
which was sent to every mayor and councillor in New Zealand. NZCC have kindly granted
permission for us to share the briefing paper, it has our highest recommendation.
Cats who have not been microchipped will be put to death, simply for being Cats.
One of the main changes the councils and their antifelinist cronies at LGNZ
are likely to seek is the complete expungement of the 'stray' designation from the
Animal Welfare Act, leaving the designations of 'owned', meaning Cats with a
functional microchip and 'feral' meaning any Cat who does not immediately return an
identification when scanned with a microchip scanner. Any Cat who does not return an
ID when scanned will likely be immediately executed simply for being a Cat.
On Page 44 of the National Cat Management Strategy Discussion Paper
dated September 2017, recommended methods of execution are listed as a blow to the
head with a solid object or a head shot with a firearm or alternatively a captive
bolt gun. NCMSG also suggest cutting the throats of Cats afterwards to ensure they
have been killed.
It beggars belief that SPCA, NZ Veterinary Association and NZ Companion Animal
Council have senior staff acting in their official capacity as members of the
National Cat Management Strategy Group. Our view is none of these organisations can
be trusted until all of their staff who are involved with NCMSG are dismissed from SPCA, NZVA
and NZCAC. Additionally. each of these organisations must admit they are wrong and tender formal
apologies in the media for what they have planned.
Chances are the microchip ID will also be used to issue infringement notices
to those citizens who have complied with the registration directive. This means if
your Cats are implanted with a microchip and happen to not be wearing a collar with
a bell on it, or you have failed to lock your Cats up during the hours of darkness,
or your Cats wander into a supposed 'wildlife sensitive zone', you will be given an
infringement notice and a fine. That is assuming the antifelinists do not just
execute your Cats even if they have the microchip ID as Auckland park rangers
have been doing at Shakespear Open Sanctuary (1).
Following the vote, only one article appeared on 25 July 2017 at Fairfax
Media's 'Stuff' website. Fairfax Media obfuscated the article in the environment
news index by listing the headline as "Sugary drinks policy vote", as can be seen
from the screenshot we captured above. One actually has to view the article itself
to notice the complete headline which reads "Local government vote in favour of
sugary drinks and 'Cat control' policies". This suggests to us the hidden powers who
in our opinion direct Fairfax Media to dispense propaganda for social engineering
purposes wanted this report to slip through without being noticed too much lest a
public outcry be precipitated.
Radio NZ quoted Dunedin councillor Aaron Hawkins (Green) as stating "We're
increasingly getting the message from our community that they want to be able to
give effect to our ambitions as a predator free nation and we can't do that unless
we address the issue of the impact Cats have on our environment". Thanks for outing
yourself as an antifelinist Aaron, we'll be watching you forever. Cat hater, WCC
Councillor Iona Pannett (Green) "welcomed the move", no surprises there.
Invercargill mayor Tim Shadbolt, who's council already restricts citizens from
keeping any more than three Cats per household and uses captive bolt guns to execute dogs
reaffirmed his antifelinist sentiments with the statement "It gives us the authority
to take action on it once we've got a policy". Would you like a peaked cap, armbands
and set of jackboots with your order, Tim?
The above quote is a prime example of how the mainstream media manipulates
words and manipulates the facts to warp the truth. The fact of the matter is at
present, central government itself has no 'national Cat management strategy' at all.
All that has occurred is LGNZ, an industry association for the local government
sector with zero statutory function or rights, has voted by the slimmest of margins
to begin the process of lobbying central government. It appears to us LGNZ has
chosen this course of action due to careful manipulation by both the Morgan cult and
the subversive National Cat Management Strategy Group, which includes three LGNZ
representatives amongst it's ranks. This is an object lesson in how the mainstream
media works to program the inattentive masses, slipping a statement in that is not
true with the intention of programming the minds of citizens to believe something is
true when it clearly isn't. But wait, we have another example!
A similar deceptive approach intended to manipulate the minds of citizens
appeared in the Rodney Times on 1 August 2017. The headline states "'Cat Curfew'
Divides Rodney Residents", however the truth of the matter is there is no 'Cat
curfew' in place in Rodney or anywhere else in New Zealand at this time. Clearly a
headline like this is intended to normalise the idea of 'Cat curfews' in the eye of
the public as part of the mainstream media's orchestrated libelous propaganda
campaign against the Cats. The information we have received states the article is
based around a mere 23 replies to the initial post at the Rodney Times page on the
Neighbourly social media website. For the record Fairfax Media own 22.5% of the Neighbourly site
and as the article includes a direct link to the Rodney Times page at Neighbourly,
it appears this article has the dual purpose of not only misinforming the public
about the non-existent 'Cat curfew' mentioned in the headline, but is also intended
to drive traffic to the Neighbourly site. Essentially the article amounts to clickbait
in service of post-truth politics.
NZ Herald Supports The Position Of The Antifelinist Gareth Morgan
The print edition of this NZ Herald weekend editorial was entitled "Morgan's
Conservation Plan Far From Catastrophic". We're not sure what the NZ Herald is
trying to achieve in this instance by using two different headlines for the online
and print editions, but the article promotes the views and misconceptions of New
Zealand's number one antifelinist, TOP Party leader and wanna be dictator, Mr Gareth
Morgan. The article promotes the misconception that "Feral cats are usually 'pets'
that have been abandoned, neglected or escaped". In truth, those Cats who have been
"abandoned, neglected or escaped" generally would be classified as 'strays' under
the Animal Welfare Act. True 'feral' Cats are born and bred in the wild, fend for
themselves and have zero contact with humans. Our opinion is the editor is
consciously making the best effort to convince readers to think of 'stray' Cats as
The article states Cats are "normally indifferent to commands". That's true to
some extent, but it's easy enough to direct Cats if one knows how to go about it.
Once the engineered ongoing media campaign demonizing Cats has been consigned to
history's trashcan right beside antisemitism and other forms of manufactured
discrimination, we'll show you how to go about directing Cats. For now, we state
Cats are a totally different species to dogs and authoritarian shouted commands are
not about to work with Cats. Additionally, while collars work just fine on dogs,
collars are proven to be a health risk for Cats.
The editorial states "The animal has chosen to make your home its own as long
as you feed it". Again, not a whole lot of thought has gone into this and clearly
the author is lacking in spiritual insight. While food and shelter are factors,
there are all sorts of other reasons a Cat may chose to grace one with it's presence
in your home. Those who keep Cats already know this, those lesser humans who have
allowed themselves to become disconnected from their souls and thus are barren of
the power of the heart will never understand until they re-engage the connection
with their hearts and souls if they can.
Also included is the questionable assumption that Cats are "contributing to
the diminished birdlife these days in the bush and urban parks" and makes the
blatantly untrue claim that "almost the only place most Kiwis hear this country's
native birdsong is when they walk past a recording of it". Our response to this is
while we concede true 'feral' Cats in the bush will be catching whatever they can in
order to survive, every day our garden is visited by numerous native birds. Kaka,
ruru, tui, fantail, silvereye to name a few, and we also keep Cats. We have never
once witnessed our Cats or our neighbours Cats engage themselves in predating on
birds. Either the editor of the NZ Herald needs to wise up to the facts, or for one
reason or another the editor is dispensing disinformation on behalf of the Morgan
The article closes with the statement "Cat lovers should listen". To which we
respond, we are researching and documenting each organisation and each individual
who has chosen to engage themselves in antifelinism. None of this will be
This article gives us a little more information and quotes one Dr Helen
Beattie of Otago SPCA. We're familiar with her, she is one of the New Zealand
Veterinary Association representatives amongst the subversives who comprise the
National Cat Management Strategy Group (NCMSG). Helen Beattie is quoted as stating
the strategy and remit were "about cultural change of how we engage and have Cats in
our lives and our environment". Interesting, compare Beattie's statement with this
statement from the antifelinist Geoff Simmons of the Morgan cult made in March 2015:
"Realistically, this is a process of cultural change"(2)
In our view these two statements are too similar to be a coincidence. It appears Helen
Beattie is following to the letter the directives of Gareth Morgan's antifelinist hate group.
NZ Taxpayers Union suggested citizens who signed their petition - 'No to compulsory registration of Cats'
contact Local Government NZ and share their opinion. Calls to LGNZ were forwarded to
their principal policy adviser, Mike Reid who is of course also member of National
Cat Management Strategy Group. This suggests to us it is NCMSG who is really the
body behind the remit document advocating 'Cat control'. It appears to us
Dunedin Mayor Dave Cull is essentially the Judas who has selfishly placed the lives
of countless Cats in danger by being the patsy who was engaged to submit the remit
before LGNZ for vote. It seems the reward he received for his services to
antifelinism is his promotion to the LGNZ presidency.
Guyon Espiner asks "Is this a Cat cull?". Dave Cull laughs at Guyon then
states Cats are a risk to native wildlife and that councils are seeking some 'tools'
to 'control' Cats in order to protect native wildlife. Cull correctly states
councils do not have sufficient powers to protect native wildlife and councils only
have powers to regulate Cats when there is risk to human health.
Guyon cites an article in Otago Daily Times which reports on WCC's position on
compulsory microchipping, Cull becomes evasive at this point, probably because he
knows the WCC animal bylaw is illegal and would not survive a judicial review. Cull stutters and
states he is not clear on WCC's position. Guyon asks how does a 'Cat curfew'
work?. Cull responds "You keep it inside at night". Guyon responds "or what?". Cull
becomes more evasive and claims he does not understand the question.
Cull then states "One of the reasons for microchipping Cats is that if you are
seeking to trap 'feral Cats' and you trap a Cat that is actually a domesticated pet
then you can tell it's domesticated and you don't destroy it. So in the case of
curfews you might actually be keeping the Cats inside for their own protection
because in areas where you want to protect native wildlife you may be trapping
'feral' Cats". Cull also states: "A good deal of the risk (to native wildlife) is
Cats" and "If a Cat is caught in a cage it is not killed, you capture it then you
determine if it's microchipped, whether it's domesticated or not, or if it's
'feral'". So there you have it, what Local Government NZ really seeks is compulsory
microchipping and the expungement of the 'stray' designation from the Animal Welfare
Act. Then if a Cat does not immediately return an ID on a scanner it will be
classified as 'feral' and executed simply for being a Cat.
This next one quotes LGNZ president Dave Cull at length, he claims "Dunedin
has had instances of people feeding 'feral' Cats, resulting in up to 50 or 60 cats in
some areas". Once again we see the antifelinist faction designating Cats defined as
stray under the Animal Welfare Act as 'feral'. In this case as people are apparently
feeding the Cats Cull refers to, the true situation would classify as a managed
colony. Certainly the law is clear that if non domestic Cats are being served by
humans, then those Cats are classified as stray under law. Either Cull is simply
ignorant of the law, or he lies through his teeth.
Cull is quoted as stating "We need some tools, and that's what we're asking for".
What sort of tools would you like antifelinist? Some some 'blunt objects'
perhaps? Some 'firearms' perchance? How about a few 'captive bolt guns' and a big
knife to slit their throats to ensure they are dispatched in the name of
'conservation'. The article ends by promoting the misguided opinion of the Morgan
cult. Clearly Newshub is just as complicit with Morgan's cult as Fairfax and
We conducted some research in the interest of discovering if any of the other
persons associated with actively promoting the prospect of 'Cat control' measures
via the remit document voted on at the LGNZ AGM might have recently been rewarded
with promotion for their services to antifelinism. Strangely enough, Helen Beattie
also received a promotion a couple of weeks prior to Dave Cull becoming President
of LGNZ. She's been appointed Chief Veterinary Officer of NZVA.
Coincidence? It's possible, we'll leave it to our supporters to decide for themselves.
The report states Helen Beattie already has experience in mass extermination
while she was working in United Kingdom dealing with an outbreak of foot and mouth
disease, which is described as an "incredible experience...despite all its
heinousness". We assume she has no qualms about being party to the proposed mass
extermination of New Zealand's Cats.
This press release from NZ Veterinary Association states "NZVA encourages and
supports the development of national legislation that would promote responsible Cat
'ownership' and improve the lives and welfare of all Cats". Well, they would, we
calculate an estimated $120 million dollars profit to be made from microchipping the
nation's Cats coupled with a further $9 Million per annum to microchip new Cats
according to calculations provided by NZ Taxpayers Union. It's clear to us cold hard
profit is the real motive. NZVA cite every alleged issue in the book to support
their position because they are motivated by profit. Interestingly enough, there is
only one economist involved with NCMSG, Geoff Simmons of the Morgan cult, our guess
is he is the one who baited the rest of them with the prospect of profit beyond
their wildest dreams.
It is said money is the root of all evil, and this is a fact that certainly
applies here with the ongoing insidious push for 'Cat control'. Once we fathom in
the profit to be made from compulsory microchipping, not to mention the profit to be
made from the mass extermination of all unregistered Cats by allegedly 'humane'
methods, we have no doubt about their true motivation.
Far North District Council - Acting Outside Of The Law
We investigated the Far North District Council bylaw mentioned in this
article, which states "It also prohibits people from having Cats or Kittens if the
council decides the Felines are or are likely to become a nuisance or dangerous to
people and wildlife". This comes under Chapter 13 of FNDC General Bylaws. The
document states the bylaw is pursuant to the powers in the Local Government Act 2002
and the Health Act 1956. The document may be downloaded from the FNDC website
Section 1306.2 of the bylaw, under the heading "Cats as a nuisance" states: No
person shall keep Cats or Kittens if in the opinion of the council the keeping of
such Cats or Kittens is, or is likely to become, a nuisance or annoyance to any
person or potentially dangerous or injurious to health, or a danger to wildlife. The
said bylaw is anything but specific and as such is open to misinterpretation if not
open to outright abuse.
It appears to us FNDC is very likely to be acting outside of it's legal powers
by including "or a danger to wildlife" in this bylaw. Our understanding is the
protection of wildlife is not covered in either the Local Government Act 2002 or the
Health Act 1956 and we would expect the section which includes 'protection of
wildlife' is ultra vires (illegal). We do wonder how many other councils also
have created similar illegal bylaws.
FNDC Deputy Mayor Appointed To The Northland Conservation Board
As deputy mayor Tania McInnes represented FNDC at the 2017 LGNZ AGM supporting
the DCC antifelinist remit document, we decided we would investigate her further. We
were surprised to discover that in July 2017 she was appointed as a member of the
Northland Conservation Board. How interesting, yet another individual who supported
the DCC antifelinist remit document coincidentally appointed to a position of power
in July 2017. To review: Dunedin mayor Dave Cull became President of LGNZ, Helen
Beattie became Chief Veterinary Officer of NZVA and FNDC deputy mayor Tania McInnes
was appointed to the Northland Conservation Board. So many synchronicities
associated with the DCC antifelinist remit paper, it may as well be a magickal
talisman. As we said earlier in this article, we'll leave it to our supporters to
decide for themselves.
FNDC Draconian Dog Control Proposal Angers Dog Lovers
On 12 August 2017 a report in the Northern Advocate covered FNDC's intention
to place further restrictions on dogs. The proposed new animal policy which intends
to place a limit of one dog per household, using the Resource Management Act to ban
the keeping of all companion animals in new homes and other draconian restrictions
created an outrage amongst Northland dog owners. The proposed restrictions are
undoubtedly designed to 'protect wildlife'. FNDC are on very shaky ground from a
legal perspective citing protecting wildlife when it comes to placing restrictions
on companion animals.
One of our supporters in Northland stated in an email message: "All dogs and
their owners on the Russell peninsular will in future have to use the car ferry
($6.50 each way) to get to the other side to walk on beaches there. Russell beaches
shall become dog free". It is abundantly clear FNDC have been fully compromised by
the influence of the environmental extremist movement. It is only a matter of time
before other councils attempt to follow suit. Without doubt the environmentalists
who have infiltrated local government have the ultimate aim of the total elimination
of all companion animals in New Zealand.
The guardians of Northland's canines were quite rightly outraged FNDC's bylaw
proposal and formed the BOI WatchDogs
group which took FNDC to task over their proposed anti-canine legislation. On 26th
September this report appeared which states mayor John Carter has agreed to have the
entire bylaw proposal rewritten. As it appears FNDC is in the habit of fabricating
illegal bylaws, Feline Rights will be monitoring what FNDC come up with in their
Some elected representatives at Whangarei District Council appear to be
considerably smarter others. WDC councillors questioned the practicality of 'Cat
control' legislation and quite rightly determined such legislation would be a
management nightmare. Councillor Greg Martin was quoted as stating: "Cats are
absolutely critical to a lot of people in our district. Let's send a message to Cat
lovers in our district of 'We support you'". Councillor Crichton Christie stated
'Cat control' would be a "nightmare for councils to deal with" and "have you ever
tried to catch a Cat?".
Once more we note Fairfax Media promoting the 'companion' vs 'feral' line ad
nauseum and conveniently omitting the 'stray' designation as defined under law. As
this next article demonstrates, Whanagrei District Council has also been infiltrated
by deluded environmentalists who have not taken time to consider the huge can of
worms they open. Councillor Anna Murphy, who claims to love Cats (ha!) was adamant
Cats are a 'threat to wildlife'. Councillor Stuart Bell claimed microchipping would
protect 'pets'. Not 'pets' Stuart, family members. You may as well be coming after
our children. Protect our family members from what? Environmentalist execution
squads? Councillor Crichton Christie stated: "If we went out shooting them all hell
would let loose". You got it Crichton, it's called social unrest and it's intensely
fermenting below the surface as we write.